COVID-19 AND LIABILITY TO BEING AN ACCESSORY TO CRIMINAL FRAUD IN SOUTH AFRICA
COVID19 AND LIABILITY TO BEING AN ACCESSORY TO CRIMINAL FRAUD IN SOUTH AFRICA
If it is claimed that this foreign corporation has authority to in-act legislation, proof of where it obtained such authority must be provided.
In law, this is an ABUSE OF POWER called a Breach of ULTRA VIRES LAWS meaning 'They have gone BEYOND THE SCOPE OF POWERS' that We The People have given them.
FACEMASKS:
Where has the RSA Corporation delivered it's evidence substantiating that it has authority over we the people as men and women? How that arose and the nature of the source of it's authority to make decisions that deprive us of our entitlements without our expressed written consent? RSA Corporation shall refrain from referring to any legislation, act, statute or code, unless it can first deliver evidence with it's claim, that it applies we the people, the living beings.
1) Evidence
that masks prevent infection
2) Evidence
that masks don't cause oxygen deprivation which can lead to seizures
3) Evidence
that breathing in your own carbon dioxide does not cause bacterial infections
and respiratory disorders
4) Evidence
that wearing masks does not cause stress and anxiety
5) Evidence
that wearing masks prevented the spread of the Spanish Flu
6) Evidence
that dismissal for not wearing a mask at work would not represent a
material breach of Constitutional Rights which entitles your staff to claim
compensation for discrimination, as well as unfair dismissal
7) Evidence
that the government lurgy has ever been proven to exist
8) Evidence that it is not a crime ancillary to genocide to collaborate with government policy, which has already resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths in care homes and hospitals
9) Evidence
that the government has not relied upon fraudulent data to frighten the
population into fearful compliance with its legally unenforceable diktats
10) Evidence
that the South African High Court have not declared the lockdown under the
Disaster Management Act, INVALID on 2 June 2020
The South African Government/RSA Corporation have to date, failed to delivered material evidence and factual proof of the following:
2. Evidence that the COVID experimental injections do not have any detrimental health effects, amongst which are, but not limited to, neurological, physical impairment, paralysis, long lasting and detrimental side effects and/or death.
3. Evidence that COVID experimental injections have been thoroughly tested according to the full rigours of historic testing procedures (usually lasting years) and do not fall short in any respect, of these essential processes .
4. Evidence that COVID experimental injections have been able to halt/prevent the conditions they are allegedly created for.
5. Evidence that the government lurgy has ever been proven to exist, thus entailing demand for an experimental injection to prevent it.
6. Evidence that Section 3 of the Disaster Management Act, 2000 (Act No. 57 of 2002) and the Covid-19 regulations which arose out of it are not adjudged to be repugnant and void under the common law.
7. Evidence that it is not a crime ancillary to genocide to collaborate with government policy, which has already resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths in care homes and hospitals.
8. Evidence that the government has not relied upon fraudulent data to frighten the population into fearful compliance with its legally unenforceable diktats.
9. Evidence that if covid experimental injections are safe as we are told, why creators of said injections are offered 100% immunity against prosecution in the case they (the experimental injections) are found to be not safe and cause/create unwanted side effects, illness, loss of function physical/and/or mental or even death.
10. Evidence that the government and or its agencies/partners are not working towards a program of genocide on the population.
11. Evidence that any forced coercion or demand in any form against men and women, to be subjected to experimental injection is not directly contrary to any or each of the ten points of the Nuremberg Code of Ethics.
EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1:
Exhibit 2: Companies with names matching "SOUTH AFRICA" |
Exhibit 4:
Exhibit 5:
Masks:
The Science & The Myths (Dr. Lee Merritt)
Exhibit 6:
'Masks
Are Symbolic,' say Dr Fauci and The New England Journal of Medicine
Exhibit 7:
Masks Do Not
Prevent the Spread of the "Virus"
Exhibit 8:
Court
Tears Up Mask Rule in Germany’s Dusseldorf
Exhibit 9:
Exhibit 10:
5 NIH studies from 2004-2020 all
finding verifiable health effects from wearing a face mask, including
scientifically verified reduction in blood oxygen level:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29395560/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32590322/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15340662/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26579222/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31159777/
Cloth Mask Study
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/
Exhibit 11:
Alan Winde trying to be important - You WILL wear a mask or ELSE!
Exhibit 12:
Exhibit 21:
Exhibit 22:
Exhibit 23:
THEY WERE FORCED TO ADMIT THAT 'COVID19' DOES NOT EXIST
Heartbreaking tragedies reported after taking COVID vaccine; California has worst virus spread in US