Mr President: e-Tolls is NOT "The New Dispensation"

e-Tolls = Racketeering & Extortion by the ANC

Do you honestly believe us taxpayers are that stupid that we are going to buy-in to all the nonsense you announced in Parliament on 21st May 2015 regarding “compromise”?  There is NO COMPROMISE here?  When is the ANC going to acknowledge the fact that WE, the citizens of South Africa PAY YOUR SALARY AND YOU WORK FOR US, “THE PEOPLE OF S.A.”, AND NOT SANRAL?  You do what is in the best interest of the people who pay your salary my friend so you will be doing yourself a great service to let this one go for the sake of the ANC’s reputation and your own.
CONSEQUENCES OF THE ANC’s BLACKMAILING INITIATIVE
Have you and your ANC “advisers” thought about the consequences of your attempt to force an entire country into agreeing to extortion and racketeering? Here are just a few:
1.People will not renew their licenses – Government will lose out on that income altogether.
2. Promotion of false information being provided on license renewal becomes reality.
3. Your Traffic Dept. will be inundated with attempts to arrest innocent citizens because the ANC forced these citizens into a position they had no right to force them into…but it set the criminal example that if the ANC can commit unethical acts, so can we.
4. The more you arrest the more the economy degrades and goes backwards because people stop driving to work as they are either sitting in prison or not driving on the roads they have a constitutional right to drive on because you and the ANC won’t let them pay for their licenses?
5. Companies will be forced to provide work from home capability or close down and leave S.A.
6. Like the cloning of vehicle registration plates has increased, so will we see an increase in the black market, for false licensing
7. The e-Toll bridges will be torn and broken down by South African Citizens to an irreparable point of NO RETURN should the ANC and yourself continue with this abomination.
And the list goes on and on and (I) Mr President have left Gauteng and will NOT be renewing my next license but WILL be waiting instead to get arrested because that will be when (I) like many of my fellow, clever, intelligent and educated citizens of S.A. (who are financially supporting OUTASA), will make one phone call and will meet you in the Constitutional Courts of our land with all the media present to watch the fight go down, so bring it on if that is what the ANC really wants?
I invite you to AVOID financially raping us any further.  Do the ANC not GET that no amount discounts or restructuring of the SANRAL e-Tolling initiative changes the FACT that this initiative in itself is forbidden by US, the Citizens of South Africa and that nothing (except termination) changes the below:
What if you don’t pay e-tolls? -YOU CANNOT BE ARRESTED OR PROSECUTED
e-toll texts branded 'unlawful, extortion'
E-Toll > A Menace to Society 
E-toll ire bubbles over
THE WAY FORWARD
Understanding the logic and issues above, OUTASA and its many thousands of supporters are of the strong opinion that e-tolling of GFIP is fundamentally flawed and has been introduced unlawfully.
It is most certainly NOT in the best interests of the citizen and works against the ultimate role that Government ought to play – i.e. to enhance the well-being of its citizens. OUTA and its members have embarked on a course of legal action to challenge the e-Toll implementation, in its current form. While Part A of their application (the urgent Interdict) to halt the launch of e-Tolling before the planned launch date of 30 April 2012) was successful, Part B of the case (The Review) from 26 to 28 November 2012 was not. In OUTA’s opinion, the judgement handed down on 13 December 2012 by Judge Vorster, was fundamentally flawed and therefore sought to appeal this outcome. OUTA’s appeal to the Supreme Court in Bloemfontein was set aside and not entertained due to a technicality (within administration law), for the time taken to bring the matter to court (outside 180 days of the proven period when the issue came to OUTA’s attention. The Supreme Court however expressly indicating the lawfulness of Sanral's actions still needs to be tested and tested it will be, in such an instance when someone is summonsed for failing to pay for e-tolls (and there are tens, if not hundreds of thousands that are not paying e-tolls).
In this case, the technical arguments do not apply and the Judge(s) will have to hear the detailed arguments and input pertaining to SANRAL’s behaviour when seeking approval from Cabinet to introduce e-tolls. In this regard, OUTA has a wealth of information pertaining to SANRAL’s unlawful and misleading behaviour, which we will bring to a qualifying court challenge on e-Tolls, should we raise the necessary funds from society to cover the legal costs. - See more 
Copyright © ZesttyMe. All Rights Reserved

Popular posts from this blog

COVID-19 AND LIABILITY TO BEING AN ACCESSORY TO CRIMINAL FRAUD IN SOUTH AFRICA

ISRAEL: Biowarfare and the engineering of a Middle East war on our doorstep